Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is a commercial penetration testing solution by Hackurity. Ruler is a free penetration testing solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.
Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths
A tool for interacting with Exchange servers remotely and exploiting client-side Outlook features.
See more solutions in this category, or build a security stack from your picks.
Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.
Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
Ruler fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Ruler for penetration testing.
Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.
Ruler: A tool for interacting with Exchange servers remotely and exploiting client-side Outlook features.
The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.
Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is made by Hackurity. Ruler is open-source with 2,259 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and Ruler are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Vulnerability Exploitation. Key differences: Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is Commercial while Ruler is Free, Ruler is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.