GitHub Code Security is a commercial static application security testing solution by Microsoft. Offensive 360 O360 is a commercial static application security testing solution by Offensive360. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.
Code scanning, dependency review, and secret scanning inside GitHub.
SAST tool using virtual compilers to analyze source code for vulnerabilities
See more solutions in this category, or build a security stack from your picks.
Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.
GitHub Code Security fits if you want a cloud product and you want an open-source product.
Offensive 360 O360 fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
Common questions when comparing GitHub Code Security vs Offensive 360 O360 for static application security testing.
GitHub Code Security: Code scanning, dependency review, and secret scanning inside GitHub, built by Microsoft.
Offensive 360 O360: SAST tool using virtual compilers to analyze source code for vulnerabilities, built by Offensive360.
The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.
GitHub Code Security is open-source. Offensive 360 O360 is made by Offensive360. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Often, yes. GitHub Code Security and Offensive 360 O360 are both Static Application Security Testing products, and both cover Source Code Analysis. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.
Need the answer fast? Best SAST Solutions for Business picks Checkmarx One Application Security Platform, Veracode Application Risk Management Platform, OpenText Fortify SAST and 4 more.See the shortlist
