Firezone is a free zero trust network access solution. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access is a commercial zero trust network access solution by ThreatLocker. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.
An open source platform for secure remote access management with granular access control
ZTNA that brokers access from authorized users/devices to internal resources, no VPN
See more solutions in this category, or build a security stack from your picks.
Need the answer fast? Best ZTNA Solutions for Business picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.See the shortlist
Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.
Firezone fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access fits if you want a cloud product.
Common questions when comparing Firezone vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access for zero trust network access.
Firezone: An open source platform for secure remote access management with granular access control.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: ZTNA that brokers access from authorized users/devices to internal resources, no VPN. Built by ThreatLocker.
The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.
Firezone is open-source with 8,520 GitHub stars. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access is made by ThreatLocker. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Often, yes. Firezone and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover Remote Access. Key differences: Firezone is Free while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access is Commercial, Firezone is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.