Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM) is a commercial access management tool by Exostar. Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial access management tool by Microsoft. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best access management fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM)
Enterprise security teams managing clinical trial ecosystems should use Exostar Secure Access Manager for its purpose-built SSO across 122+ trial applications, eliminating the friction of federated identity management across sponsor and site networks. The platform's automated provisioning workflows combined with real-time audit trails and training compliance tracking directly address FDA and ICH regulatory requirements that generic IAM platforms treat as afterthoughts. Not the right fit for organizations needing broad identity governance across non-clinical workloads; this tool's strength is precisely its narrow specialization in trial access workflows.
Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.
IAM platform for clinical trial access mgmt with SSO across 122+ apps.
Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM) vs Microsoft Entra ID for your access management needs.
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM): IAM platform for clinical trial access mgmt with SSO across 122+ apps. built by Exostar. Core capabilities include Single Sign-On (SSO) across 122+ clinical trial applications, Delegated administration for sponsor and site teams, Automated rules-based access provisioning workflows..
Microsoft Entra ID: Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises. built by Microsoft. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication..
Both serve the Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM) differentiates with Single Sign-On (SSO) across 122+ clinical trial applications, Delegated administration for sponsor and site teams, Automated rules-based access provisioning workflows. Microsoft Entra ID differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication.
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM) is developed by Exostar. Microsoft Entra ID is developed by Microsoft. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM) and Microsoft Entra ID serve similar Access Management use cases: both are Access Management tools, both cover SSO, Single Sign On. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox