Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG) is a commercial access management tool by Exostar. Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial access management tool by Microsoft. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best access management fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG)
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing third-party partner access across regulated supply chains will get the most from Exostar Managed Access Gateway because it handles the friction of federated identity at scale without forcing partners through your internal IAM infrastructure. The platform covers ITAR, DFARS, and NIST 800-171 compliance natively, and its pre-vetted network of 200,000 organizations cuts onboarding cycles from weeks to days. Skip this if your partner ecosystem is small or you need deep workforce IAM controls; MAG is purpose-built for B2B access governance, not employee identity management.
Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.
Federated IAM gateway for secure, compliant B2B partner access mgmt.
Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG) vs Microsoft Entra ID for your access management needs.
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG): Federated IAM gateway for secure, compliant B2B partner access mgmt. built by Exostar. Core capabilities include Federated identity management with SSO for external partner access, Centralized identity hub connecting users to approved applications, Delegated administration allowing partner orgs to manage their own user access..
Microsoft Entra ID: Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises. built by Microsoft. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication..
Both serve the Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG) differentiates with Federated identity management with SSO for external partner access, Centralized identity hub connecting users to approved applications, Delegated administration allowing partner orgs to manage their own user access. Microsoft Entra ID differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication.
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG) is developed by Exostar. Microsoft Entra ID is developed by Microsoft. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Exostar Managed Access Gateway (MAG) and Microsoft Entra ID serve similar Access Management use cases: both are Access Management tools, both cover SSO. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox