Enclave vs Fortra ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Enclave is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Enclave. Fortra ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Fortra. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
CST VerdictShort answer
Teams replacing VPNs with zero trust access will move faster with Enclave because it deploys non-disruptively through RMM without additional infrastructure or hardware, cutting implementation friction in half. The platform's direct peer-to-peer connectivity model and cloud policy engine directly map to NIST PR.AA (identity and access control), addressing the access limitation requirement without the management overhead of traditional server-based architecture. Skip this if you need deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or require a vendor with established enterprise support depth; Enclave's five-person team means you're buying velocity and technical soundness, not hand-holding at scale. Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap.
