Duo Multi-Factor Authentication vs Iru AI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Duo Multi-Factor Authentication

Teams prioritizing frictionless adoption across mixed device ecosystems should start with Duo Multi-Factor Authentication; its push-based approval model converts skeptical end users faster than SMS or TOTP alone, which matters when you're racing against internal resistance. The platform covers NIST CSF 2.0's PR.AA authentication requirement and ships with straightforward integrations for common SaaS and on-prem applications, reducing deployment friction in mid-market environments. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication as your primary mechanism or require deep integration with legacy mainframe systems where Duo's cloud-native design creates friction.

Iru AI

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Apple, Windows, and Android devices will gain most from Iru AI's passwordless authentication tied to device identity, which eliminates the credential-stuffing surface area that plagues traditional MFA deployments. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM strongly through device-bound authentication and continuous endpoint monitoring, plus its compliance automation with evidence collection reduces audit labor substantially. Skip this if you need mature incident response and forensics capabilities; Iru's strength is prevention and continuous compliance, not RS.AN depth.