Cybral STORM ATTACKER is a commercial breach & attack simulation solution by Cybral. Red Team Automation (RTA) is a free breach & attack simulation solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.
BAS tool that validates exploit paths via safe, controlled attack simulations.
A Python-based framework that generates evidence of MITRE ATT&CK tactics to help blue teams test their detection capabilities against simulated malicious activities.
See more solutions in this category, or build a security stack from your picks.
Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.
Cybral STORM ATTACKER fits if you want a cloud product.
Red Team Automation (RTA) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
Common questions when comparing Cybral STORM ATTACKER vs Red Team Automation (RTA) for breach & attack simulation.
Cybral STORM ATTACKER: BAS tool that validates exploit paths via safe, controlled attack simulations. Built by Cybral.
Red Team Automation (RTA): A Python-based framework that generates evidence of MITRE ATT&CK tactics to help blue teams test their detection capabilities against simulated malicious activities.
The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.
Cybral STORM ATTACKER is made by Cybral. Red Team Automation (RTA) is open-source with 1,090 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Often, yes. Cybral STORM ATTACKER and Red Team Automation (RTA) are both Breach & Attack Simulation products, and both cover Red Team, MITRE ATT&CK. Key differences: Cybral STORM ATTACKER is Commercial while Red Team Automation (RTA) is Free, Red Team Automation (RTA) is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.
