Com Olho Bug Bounty Program vs Intigriti Managed VDP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Com Olho Bug Bounty Program

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that want to outsource vulnerability discovery without building an internal bug bounty operation should evaluate Com Olho Bug Bounty Program; its strength lies in researcher reward management and continuous assessment across web applications, APIs, and infrastructure, not just one attack surface. The platform maps directly to NIST ID.RA and ID.AM, meaning you get structured risk discovery tied to your actual asset inventory rather than ad-hoc findings. Skip this if you need a managed security testing service with guaranteed SLAs or if your organization lacks the internal capacity to triage and remediate reported bugs quickly; Com Olho works best when you have security staff ready to act on inbound disclosures.

Intigriti Managed VDP

Mid-market and enterprise security teams who want vulnerability disclosure handled without building internal triage infrastructure should choose Intigriti Managed VDP; the platform's report triage services mean your team reviews findings already vetted and prioritized by experienced researchers rather than drowning in noise. The vendor operates across 684 employees with European compliance roots, and the platform directly addresses ID.RA risk assessment and RS.AN incident analysis, meaning you get both structured vulnerability intake and post-submission investigation support. Skip this if your organization already has mature researcher relationships or prefers a pure self-service model; Intigriti's strength is in the managed layer, not in giving you an empty toolbox to build your own program.