Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA vs Keypasco ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Cognitas. Keypasco ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Keypasco. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
SMB and mid-market teams replacing VPNs should pick Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA for its zero-touch deployment, which cuts the implementation friction that kills most ZTNA rollouts. ML-driven access policies and support for legacy applications mean you're not ripping out infrastructure to get zero trust working, just redirecting traffic through identity controls. Skip this if you need deep API-first architecture; CrossLink prioritizes ease of deployment over the policy granularity that enterprise security teams with mature identity programs demand.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with true zero trust will find Keypasco ZTNA's identity-first access model genuinely simpler to operate than products that bolt trust onto existing network boundaries. The cloud-native deployment and strong NIST PR.AA coverage on identity and access control mean you're not managing IP whitelists or implicit trust zones; you're controlling who gets what, period. Skip this if you need on-premises deployment or a vendor with deep integration into existing SIEM and ticketing stacks; Keypasco's 20-person team prioritizes the core access problem over ecosystem coverage.
