Cloud Monitor (for Microsoft 365) vs Vorlon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cloud Monitor (for Microsoft 365)

K-12 IT teams protecting student data in Microsoft 365 environments should choose Cloud Monitor because it combines continuous M365 activity monitoring with automated detection of risky SaaS permissions, closing the gap between what happens inside Exchange and OneDrive and what happens when staff accidentally grant third-party apps access to student records. The platform covers DE.CM and DE.AE functions across login anomalies, file sharing patterns, and download behavior with 24/7 oversight, which matters when you're liable for FERPA compliance. Skip this if your district runs a hybrid environment heavy on Google Workspace or needs deep endpoint detection; Cloud Monitor is M365-specific by design.

Vorlon

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in SaaS sprawl and AI tool adoption will find real value in Vorlon's data-layer visibility across both ecosystems, something most CASB vendors still treat as an afterthought. The platform maps and monitors data flows touching sensitive information across 1,000+ apps while detecting unsanctioned AI activity, covering critical NIST functions in asset management, continuous monitoring, and data security that most point solutions ignore. Skip this if your organization hasn't yet catalogued which SaaS apps employees actually use or doesn't have an AI governance policy; Vorlon assumes you're past the discovery phase and ready to enforce data movement rules.