Clavister NetWall vs Fortinet Secure Networking: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Clavister NetWall

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting industrial control systems or critical infrastructure will find NetWall's on-device AI anomaly detection valuable because it doesn't depend on cloud connectivity and trains in under 15 minutes, solving the deployment speed problem in air-gapped or latency-sensitive networks. The NIST Detect and Respond coverage is genuine here: continuous monitoring with local anomaly analysis plus threat prevention (botnet blocking, DDoS mitigation) means you're catching incidents before they propagate, not just logging them. Skip this if your priority is integrated identity or endpoint visibility; NetWall is a perimeter-first tool with strong application awareness but no user behavior analytics.

Fortinet Secure Networking

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid networks with SD-WAN deployments should pick Fortinet Secure Networking because it actually consolidates firewall, access control, and threat detection into one pane instead of bolting them together later. The platform covers eight NIST CSF 2.0 functions across both prevention and response, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and incident management, so you're not betting the farm on detection alone. Skip this if your primary need is cloud-native workload security; Fortinet's architecture assumes your perimeter still matters, which it does for most organizations but not all.