Cato Networks ZTNA vs Keypasco ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cato Networks ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Cato Networks. Keypasco ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Keypasco. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with zero trust will prefer Cato Networks ZTNA for its cloud-native architecture that eliminates the need to manage on-premises infrastructure while enforcing identity-based access across hybrid IT. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and PR.IR (infrastructure resilience), meaning you get access policy enforcement without sacrificing visibility into whether your security perimeter actually holds under load. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises and needs deep microsegmentation of internal networks; Cato shines at securing remote access to distributed resources, not re-architecting the datacenter.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with true zero trust will find Keypasco ZTNA's identity-first access model genuinely simpler to operate than products that bolt trust onto existing network boundaries. The cloud-native deployment and strong NIST PR.AA coverage on identity and access control mean you're not managing IP whitelists or implicit trust zones; you're controlling who gets what, period. Skip this if you need on-premises deployment or a vendor with deep integration into existing SIEM and ticketing stacks; Keypasco's 20-person team prioritizes the core access problem over ecosystem coverage.
