Is Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 a good alternative to SecurelyShare for Email?

Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 and SecurelyShare for Email serve similar Email Encryption use cases: both are Email Encryption tools, both cover Encryption. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 vs SecurelyShare for Email (2026)

Q: What is the difference between Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 vs SecurelyShare for Email?

**Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365**: AES-256 encrypted email add-on for M365 with auth & revocation. built by Beyond Encryption. headquartered in United Kingdom. Core capabilities include AES-256 end-to-end email encryption, Recipient identity verification via SMS, Q&A, or Unipass ID, Message revocation after send (including post-open).. **SecurelyShare for Email**: End-to-end email encryption solution with centralized policy management. built by SecurelyShare. headquartered in India. Core capabilities include End-to-end email encryption without client installation, Integration with anti-spam, anti-virus, DLP, and archiving systems, Centralized policy-based encryption management.. Both serve the Email Encryption market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Q: What features do Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 vs SecurelyShare for Email offer?

**Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365** differentiates with AES-256 end-to-end email encryption, Recipient identity verification via SMS, Q&A, or Unipass ID, Message revocation after send (including post-open). **SecurelyShare for Email** differentiates with End-to-end email encryption without client installation, Integration with anti-spam, anti-virus, DLP, and archiving systems, Centralized policy-based encryption management.

Q: Who makes Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365 vs SecurelyShare for Email?

**Beyond Encryption Mailock for M365** is developed by Beyond Encryption. **SecurelyShare for Email** is developed by SecurelyShare. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.