BBT.live BeTNA vs Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

BBT.live BeTNA: ZTNA solution providing identity-based, continuous-verification network access control. built by BBT.live (BeBroadband). Core capabilities include Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement..

Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access: ZTNA platform with direct device-to-resource encrypted access via WireGuard. built by Bowtie. Core capabilities include Direct device-to-resource encrypted tunneling without backhauling through middleman networks, On-device policy enforcement for authentication, encryption, and access control, Distributed Secure Web Gateway (SWG) with on-device web filtering..

Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

BBT.live BeTNA differentiates with Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement. Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access differentiates with Direct device-to-resource encrypted tunneling without backhauling through middleman networks, On-device policy enforcement for authentication, encryption, and access control, Distributed Secure Web Gateway (SWG) with on-device web filtering.

BBT.live BeTNA is developed by BBT.live (BeBroadband). Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access is developed by Bowtie. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

BBT.live BeTNA and Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Microsegmentation. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.