aws-gate vs Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
aws-gate is a free zero trust network access tool. Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Bowtie. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams managing SSH access to AWS EC2 fleets will appreciate aws-gate for eliminating bastion host complexity; it routes connections through the AWS Systems Manager Session Manager API instead, cutting operational overhead and removing a persistent attack surface. The tool is free and open-source with 516 GitHub stars, making it genuinely low-friction to pilot in existing AWS environments. Skip this if your organization needs fine-grained IAM policy enforcement or audit logging at the session level; aws-gate prioritizes access simplicity over the compliance controls that large regulated enterprises typically require.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access
Security teams managing distributed workforces across multiple cloud regions should prioritize Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access for its refusal to backhaul traffic through centralized gateways, which eliminates the bottleneck that tanks performance in traditional ZTNA deployments. The distributed control plane runs entirely on your infrastructure, not Bowtie's, and WireGuard encryption keeps private keys out of vendor hands, addressing the NIST PR.AA identity and access control requirement without trust dependency. This isn't for buyers seeking integrated secure web gateway capabilities from a single vendor; Bowtie's on-device SWG component is functional but plays second fiddle to its network access core.
