Aikido Attack vs Grafana SSRF: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Grafana SSRF is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and red teamers validating Grafana deployments need Grafana SSRF to confirm authentication bypass chains before attackers do. The tool exploits a known authenticated SSRF vector in Grafana that stays under the radar of most scanning tools, giving you a concrete test case against a real-world monitoring platform many orgs assume is locked down. Skip this if you're looking for a general web app SSRF scanner; this is purpose-built for Grafana's specific request proxy behavior and won't generalize to your API gateway or load balancer testing.
