Agilicus vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Agilicus

Teams protecting OT and ICS environments without the luxury of deploying agents will find Agilicus solves a real problem: clientless zero trust access to PLCs, HMIs, and SCADA systems that can't run traditional security software. The no-inbound-ports architecture means your critical infrastructure never exposes attack surface to the internet, and support for federated identity providers lets you enforce MFA across resources that typically have none. Skip this if your primary concern is securing standard IT applications and desktops; plenty of lighter-weight ZTNA platforms handle that use case better and cheaper.

GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture

Security teams at startups and SMBs who need zero trust remote access without managing infrastructure will get real value from GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture; the global shared gateway network eliminates the complexity of building your own access layer, and NIS2 and HIPAA compliance support cuts approval cycles. The 25-person vendor is lean enough to move fast on customer requests but established enough to handle compliance audits. Skip this if you need deep integration with your existing SIEM or expect white-glove onboarding; GoodAccess prioritizes speed over customization, which works when your infrastructure is relatively straightforward.