AccessMatrix UAS vs SUVOLA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AccessMatrix UAS

Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on vendor-agnostic authentication will find AccessMatrix UAS valuable for avoiding lock-in while supporting biometrics, FIDO2, and hardware security modules in parallel. The platform handles 100 million plus user scale and integrates with token vendors from OneSpan to Thales without custom engineering, which matters when you're already managing heterogeneous hardware across regions. Skip this if your organization needs out-of-the-box connectors to your existing identity provider; AccessMatrix is an authentication server, not a replacement for your IAM platform.

SUVOLA

Enterprise and mid-market organizations with high-value physical and logical access control requirements should evaluate SUVOLA for its wearable identity device approach, which replaces passwords entirely across facility access, transaction authorization, and equipment activation. The platform's tamper-proof computing architecture addresses NIST PR.AA and PR.PS directly through hardware-enforced authentication that resists credential theft at the point of use. This is not the tool for buyers seeking cloud-first SSO or passwordless solutions that integrate with existing directory services; SUVOLA requires on-premises deployment and represents a fundamental shift in how your organization authenticates humans and machines.