AccessMatrix UAS vs Hypersecu HyperPKI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AccessMatrix UAS: Vendor-agnostic authentication server supporting MFA, biometrics, FIDO2 & HSMs. built by i-Sprint Innovations. Core capabilities include Pluggable authentication modules supporting passwords, OTPs, and FIDO2, Multi-biometric support: face, fingerprint, iris, voice, and palm vein recognition, FIDO2 device lifecycle management (registration, verification, and ongoing management)..

Hypersecu HyperPKI: FIPS 140-2 L3 USB smart card token for PKI auth and crypto ops. built by Hypersecu Information Systems Inc. Core capabilities include FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified onboard private key storage and generation, Certificate-based PKI authentication, Digital signing of files, emails, and documents..

Both serve the MFA & Passwordless market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

AccessMatrix UAS differentiates with Pluggable authentication modules supporting passwords, OTPs, and FIDO2, Multi-biometric support: face, fingerprint, iris, voice, and palm vein recognition, FIDO2 device lifecycle management (registration, verification, and ongoing management). Hypersecu HyperPKI differentiates with FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified onboard private key storage and generation, Certificate-based PKI authentication, Digital signing of files, emails, and documents.

AccessMatrix UAS is developed by i-Sprint Innovations. Hypersecu HyperPKI is developed by Hypersecu Information Systems Inc. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

AccessMatrix UAS integrates with OneSpan OTP tokens, Gemalto tokens, V Key tokens, OATH providers, i-Sprint YESsafe token and 4 more. Hypersecu HyperPKI integrates with Microsoft CAPI, Microsoft CNG, Microsoft Smart Card Minidriver, PKCS#11 V2.20, PC/SC and 3 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

AccessMatrix UAS and Hypersecu HyperPKI serve similar MFA & Passwordless use cases: both are MFA & Passwordless tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.