EDR Healthcheck vs SightGain Automated Cybersecurity Assessments: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Security teams that doubt their EDR is actually catching attacks should run EDR Healthcheck before your next board meeting; it runs autonomous penetration tests that expose detection gaps your vendor's marketing claims won't reveal. The tool maps directly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE, meaning you get continuous visibility into which attack techniques slip past your controls and why. Skip this if you're looking for a platform that remediates findings automatically; Healthcheck tells you what's broken, not how to fix it. Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in manual assessment work should start with SightGain because it actually tests whether your controls work against real threats, not just whether they're installed. The platform scores your technical controls empirically and maps findings directly to NIST ID.RA and DE.CM, meaning you get risk quantification tied to continuous monitoring rather than snapshot reports. Skip this if your organization needs incident response automation or threat hunting; SightGain is assessment and gap discovery, nothing downstream of detection.