Common Fate vs Venice PAM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Common Fate: JIT privileged access mgmt platform for cloud-native teams on AWS & GCP. built by Common Fate. Core capabilities include Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level..

Venice PAM: Agentless PAM platform enforcing Zero Standing Privilege via JIT access policies. built by Venice. Core capabilities include Zero Standing Privilege enforcement with JIT access issuance and automatic revocation, Agentless deployment across cloud, on-premises, and SaaS environments, Contextual, policy-driven access approvals based on identity, task, and risk context..

Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Common Fate differentiates with Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level. Venice PAM differentiates with Zero Standing Privilege enforcement with JIT access issuance and automatic revocation, Agentless deployment across cloud, on-premises, and SaaS environments, Contextual, policy-driven access approvals based on identity, task, and risk context.

Common Fate is developed by Common Fate. Venice PAM is developed by Venice. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Common Fate and Venice PAM serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover PAM, Least Privilege, SSO. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.