Com Olho Bug Bounty Program vs Inspectiv VDP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Com Olho Bug Bounty Program

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that want to outsource vulnerability discovery without building an internal bug bounty operation should evaluate Com Olho Bug Bounty Program; its strength lies in researcher reward management and continuous assessment across web applications, APIs, and infrastructure, not just one attack surface. The platform maps directly to NIST ID.RA and ID.AM, meaning you get structured risk discovery tied to your actual asset inventory rather than ad-hoc findings. Skip this if you need a managed security testing service with guaranteed SLAs or if your organization lacks the internal capacity to triage and remediate reported bugs quickly; Com Olho works best when you have security staff ready to act on inbound disclosures.

Inspectiv VDP

Security teams at SMBs and mid-market firms who lack internal bandwidth to manage researcher submissions will save significant time with Inspectiv VDP's managed intake and expert triage model, which deduplicates and validates incoming reports before they hit your queue. The platform achieves SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance with built-in safe harbor language, reducing legal friction for organizations just launching a formal vulnerability disclosure program. Skip this if you're an enterprise with a dedicated VDP team already handling intake and researcher relations; you'll pay for managed services you don't need.