Aikido Attack vs jwt-hack: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. jwt-hack is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and red teams validating JWT implementations in pre-production environments should reach for jwt-hack first; it's a focused, free utility that catches common signature bypass and algorithm confusion attacks without the overhead of commercial scanners. The 887 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction mean it gets deployed immediately and shared across teams without procurement friction. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring of JWTs in production traffic or integration with a broader AppSec platform; jwt-hack is a testing tool, not a runtime guard.
