Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Mi-Token is a commercial mfa & passwordless tool by Mi-Token. Swivel Secure is a commercial mfa & passwordless tool by Swivel Secure. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mfa & passwordless fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid on-premises infrastructure with heavy Windows AD dependency will get the most from Mi-Token; its native Credential Provider support for Windows login and ADFS integration eliminates the friction of bolted-on MFA that breaks user workflows. The token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hardware token means you're not locked into a single vendor's devices, and NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of identity management and authentication reflects solid foundational design. Skip Mi-Token if your organization is cloud-first or needs cloud-native SSO; the on-premises architecture and legacy-heavy feature set make it a poor fit for teams migrating away from Active Directory.
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need MFA without ripping out on-premise apps will find Swivel Secure's PINsafe technology and hybrid deployment model genuinely useful, particularly where legacy application security matters as much as cloud protection. The vendor's 23-person team and hybrid architecture mean you're not forced into a cloud-only migration strategy. Skip this if you're evaluating MFA purely as a cloud identity layer; Swivel's strength lies in bridging old and new infrastructure, not in replacing your identity platform wholesale.
MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration.
Enterprise MFA platform with PINsafe® tech, RBA, and SSO support.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Mi-Token vs Swivel Secure for your mfa & passwordless needs.
Mi-Token: MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration. built by Mi-Token. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token..
Swivel Secure: Enterprise MFA platform with PINsafe® tech, RBA, and SSO support. built by Swivel Secure. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via AuthControl Sentry®, Patented PINsafe® authentication technology, Risk-based authentication (RBA) with dynamic policy engine..
Both serve the MFA & Passwordless market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Mi-Token differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token. Swivel Secure differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via AuthControl Sentry®, Patented PINsafe® authentication technology, Risk-based authentication (RBA) with dynamic policy engine.
Mi-Token is developed by Mi-Token. Swivel Secure is developed by Swivel Secure. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Mi-Token and Swivel Secure serve similar MFA & Passwordless use cases: both are MFA & Passwordless tools, both cover MFA, SSO, Authentication. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox