# Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Websecurify: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Positive Technologies XSpider PRO](https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-xspider-pro) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [Positive Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/positive-technologies). [Websecurify](https://cybersectools.com/tools/websecurify) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Websecurify](https://cybersectools.com/companies/websecurify). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Positive Technologies XSpider PRO | Websecurify | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Vulnerability Assessment | Dynamic Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market | | Company | Positive Technologies | Websecurify | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Positive Technologies XSpider PRO | Websecurify | |---|---|---| | Vulnerability | Yes | – | | Scanner | Yes | – | | Security Scanning | Yes | Yes | | CVE | Yes | – | | OWASP | Yes | – | | Black Box Testing | Yes | – | | Web Scanning | Yes | – | | Network Scanning | Yes | – | | Vulnerability Prioritization | Yes | – | | Linux | Yes | – | | Web Security | – | Yes | | Open Source | – | Yes | | DevSecOps | – | Yes | | CI/CD | – | Yes | | Security Tools | – | Yes | | Node.js | – | Yes | | npm | – | Yes | | Exploitation Framework | – | Yes | | App Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **Positive Technologies XSpider PRO** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Websecurify** 4 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Positive Technologies XSpider PRO** No integrations listed. **Websecurify** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Positive Technologies XSpider PRO](https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-xspider-pro) fits if you need to run it on your own servers. - [Websecurify](https://cybersectools.com/tools/websecurify) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a startup or a mid-market company. ## Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Websecurify FAQ Common questions when comparing Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Websecurify for vulnerability assessment. ### What is the difference between Positive Technologies XSpider PRO and Websecurify? **Positive Technologies XSpider PRO**: Russian vulnerability scanner for SMB infra up to 500 hosts, black/white box. Built by Positive Technologies. **Websecurify**: Suite of web security tools, platforms, and open-source frameworks. Built by Websecurify. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Positive Technologies XSpider PRO and Websecurify? **Positive Technologies XSpider PRO** is made by Positive Technologies. **Websecurify** is made by Websecurify. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Positive Technologies XSpider PRO a good alternative to Websecurify? In part. Positive Technologies XSpider PRO and Websecurify are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Security Scanning. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Webray RayScan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/positive-technologies-xspider-pro-vs-webray-rayscan) - [Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Konvu Contextual Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/konvu-contextual-vulnerability-management-vs-positive-technologies-xspider-pro) - [Positive Technologies XSpider PRO vs Tripwire IP360](https://cybersectools.com/compare/positive-technologies-xspider-pro-vs-tripwire-ip360) - [Websecurify vs Webray RayScan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/webray-rayscan-vs-websecurify) - [Websecurify vs Konvu Contextual Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/konvu-contextual-vulnerability-management-vs-websecurify) - [Websecurify vs Tripwire IP360](https://cybersectools.com/compare/tripwire-ip360-vs-websecurify) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Positive Technologies XSpider PRO alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/positive-technologies-xspider-pro) - [See all Websecurify alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/websecurify) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/positive-technologies-xspider-pro-vs-websecurify For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-xspider-pro.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Positive Technologies XSpider PRO and Websecurify: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md