# Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs Vade for M365: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Positive Technologies PT NGFW](https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw) is a commercial [next-gen firewalls](https://cybersectools.com/categories/next-generation-firewalls) solution by [Positive Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/positive-technologies). [Vade for M365](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vade-for-m365) is a commercial [anti-phishing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/anti-phishing) solution by [Vade](https://cybersectools.com/companies/vade). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best Next-Generation Firewall Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-next-generation-firewalls) picks Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls, Fortinet FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall, Cisco Secure Firewall and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Positive Technologies PT NGFW | Vade for M365 | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Next-Gen Firewalls | Anti-Phishing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market | | Company | Positive Technologies | Vade | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Positive Technologies PT NGFW | Vade for M365 | |---|---|---| | URL Filtering | Yes | – | | TLS | Yes | – | | Traffic Filtering | Yes | – | | Network Segmentation | Yes | – | | Microsegmentation | Yes | – | | Content Filtering | Yes | – | | Virtualization | Yes | – | | Critical Infrastructure | Yes | – | | Microsoft 365 | – | Yes | | Outlook | – | Yes | | DMARC | – | Yes | | Multi Tenancy | – | Yes | | Fraud Detection | – | Yes | | Spam Prevention | – | Yes | | Office 365 | – | Yes | ### Core features **Positive Technologies PT NGFW** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Vade for M365** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Positive Technologies PT NGFW** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Vade for M365** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Positive Technologies PT NGFW](https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are an enterprise. - [Vade for M365](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vade-for-m365) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup or a small business. ## Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs Vade for M365 FAQ Common questions when comparing Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs Vade for M365 for next-gen firewalls. ### What is the difference between Positive Technologies PT NGFW and Vade for M365? **Positive Technologies PT NGFW**: Russian FSTEC-certified NGFW with IPS, app control, and TLS inspection. Built by Positive Technologies. **Vade for M365**: AI-based email security for Microsoft 365, built for MSPs to protect client mailboxes. Built by Vade. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Positive Technologies PT NGFW and Vade for M365? **Positive Technologies PT NGFW** is made by Positive Technologies. **Vade for M365** is made by Vade. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Positive Technologies PT NGFW a good alternative to Vade for M365? In part. Positive Technologies PT NGFW and Vade for M365 are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs Allot Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/allot-secure-vs-positive-technologies-pt-ngfw) - [Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs WiJungle Unified Cyber Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw-vs-wijungle-unified-cyber-security-platform) - [Positive Technologies PT NGFW vs Clavister NetWall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/clavister-netwall-vs-positive-technologies-pt-ngfw) - [Vade for M365 vs Allot Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/allot-secure-vs-vade-for-m365) - [Vade for M365 vs WiJungle Unified Cyber Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/vade-for-m365-vs-wijungle-unified-cyber-security-platform) - [Vade for M365 vs Clavister NetWall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/clavister-netwall-vs-vade-for-m365) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Positive Technologies PT NGFW alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw) - [See all Vade for M365 alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/vade-for-m365) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw-vs-vade-for-m365 For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/positive-technologies-pt-ngfw.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Positive Technologies PT NGFW and Vade for M365: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md