# Portnox ZTNA vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Portnox ZTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/portnox-ztna) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Portnox](https://cybersectools.com/companies/portnox). [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/tools/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Primary](https://cybersectools.com/companies/primary). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Portnox ZTNA | Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Portnox | Primary |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Portnox ZTNA | Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine |
|---|---|---|
| ZTNA | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud Native | Yes | – |
| Remote Access | Yes | – |
| Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes |
| RBAC | – | Yes |
| MFA | – | Yes |
| Encryption | – | Yes |
| SSO | – | Yes |
| Least Privilege | – | Yes |
| Multi Tenancy | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Portnox ZTNA**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Portnox ZTNA**

6 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine**

10 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Portnox ZTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/portnox-ztna) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business.
- [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/tools/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## Portnox ZTNA vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine FAQ

Common questions when comparing Portnox ZTNA vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine for zero trust network access.

### What is the difference between Portnox ZTNA and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine?

**Portnox ZTNA**: Cloud-native ZTNA solution for secure remote access to apps and resources. Built by Portnox.

**Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine**: Zero Trust policy engine for enterprise user, device, data & network security. Built by Primary.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Portnox ZTNA and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine?

**Portnox ZTNA** is made by Portnox. **Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine** is made by Primary. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Portnox ZTNA a good alternative to Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine?

Often, yes. Portnox ZTNA and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Portnox ZTNA vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/portnox-ztna-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Portnox ZTNA vs Agilicus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agilicus-vs-portnox-ztna)
- [Portnox ZTNA vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-portnox-ztna)
- [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs Agilicus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agilicus-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine)
- [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Portnox ZTNA alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/portnox-ztna)
- [See all Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/portnox-ztna-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/portnox-ztna.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Portnox ZTNA and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md
