# ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): side-by-side comparison (2026)

[ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [ORDAL](https://cybersectools.com/companies/ordal). [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/petep-penetration-testing-proxy) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine | PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | – | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | – | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market |
| GitHub stars | – | 225 |
| Last commit | – | Dec 2023 |
| Company | ORDAL | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine | PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | – |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability Prioritization | Yes | – |
| OWASP | Yes | – |
| Network Discovery | Yes | – |
| Inventory | Yes | – |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Proxy | – | Yes |

### Core features

**ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine**

9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)**

No features listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/petep-penetration-testing-proxy) fits if you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) FAQ

Common questions when comparing ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)?

**ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine**: Automated continuous pentesting engine that discovers assets and validates exploitability, built by ORDAL.

**PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)**: Open-source Java application for creating proxies for traffic analysis & modification.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)?

**ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine** is made by ORDAL. **PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)** is open-source with 225 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine a good alternative to PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)?

Often, yes. ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) are both Penetration Testing products. Key differences: ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine is Commercial while PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is Free, PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs Ironwood Cyber Enlight](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ironwood-cyber-enlight-vs-ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine)
- [ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine)
- [ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine-vs-runsybil)
- [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs Ironwood Cyber Enlight](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ironwood-cyber-enlight-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy)
- [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy)
- [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/petep-penetration-testing-proxy-vs-runsybil)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine)
- [See all PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/petep-penetration-testing-proxy)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md