# Offensive 360 O360 vs OpenText Fortify SAST: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Offensive 360 O360](https://cybersectools.com/tools/offensive-360-o360) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [Offensive360](https://cybersectools.com/companies/offensive360). [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [OpenText Cybersecurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/opentext-cybersecurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) Best for: Large companies wanting cloud or on-premises scans with compliance reports It earns a place because it runs as SaaS, private hosted or fully on premises, and its policies report against OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which suits regulated teams that cannot send code to a shared cloud. Decide who owns the scan policies, since blocking builds only works when someone sets what counts as a blocker. From [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions) picks Checkmarx One Application Security Platform, Veracode Application Risk Management Platform, OpenText Fortify SAST and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Offensive 360 O360 | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Static Application Security Testing | Static Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Offensive360 | OpenText Cybersecurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Offensive 360 O360 | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Binary Analysis | Yes | – | | License Compliance | Yes | – | | Source Code Analysis | Yes | Yes | | CI/CD | – | Yes | | DevSecOps | – | Yes | | IDE | – | Yes | | SAST | – | Yes | ### Core features **Offensive 360 O360** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Offensive 360 O360** 17 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Offensive 360 O360](https://cybersectools.com/tools/offensive-360-o360) fits if you are a startup or a small business. ## Offensive 360 O360 vs OpenText Fortify SAST FAQ Common questions when comparing Offensive 360 O360 vs OpenText Fortify SAST for static application security testing. ### What is the difference between Offensive 360 O360 and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Offensive 360 O360**: SAST tool using virtual compilers to analyze source code for vulnerabilities. Built by Offensive360. **OpenText Fortify SAST**: Static code analysis that finds security flaws in source code early. Built by OpenText Cybersecurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Offensive 360 O360 and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Offensive 360 O360** is made by Offensive360. **OpenText Fortify SAST** is made by OpenText Cybersecurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Offensive 360 O360 a good alternative to OpenText Fortify SAST? Often, yes. Offensive 360 O360 and OpenText Fortify SAST are both Static Application Security Testing products, and both cover Source Code Analysis. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Offensive 360 O360 vs Qodo AI Code Review Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/offensive-360-o360-vs-qodo-for-pycharm) - [Offensive 360 O360 vs Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aikido-static-application-security-testing-sast-vs-offensive-360-o360) - [Offensive 360 O360 vs Gecko Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/gecko-security-vs-offensive-360-o360) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Qodo AI Code Review Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/opentext-fortify-sast-vs-qodo-for-pycharm) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aikido-static-application-security-testing-sast-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Gecko Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/gecko-security-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Offensive 360 O360 alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/offensive-360-o360) - [See all OpenText Fortify SAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/opentext-fortify-sast) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/offensive-360-o360-vs-opentext-fortify-sast For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/offensive-360-o360.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Offensive 360 O360 and OpenText Fortify SAST: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md