# Netskope One Private Access vs NoPorts: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Netskope One Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netskope-one-private-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Netskope](https://cybersectools.com/companies/netskope). [NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/tools/noports) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Atsign](https://cybersectools.com/companies/atsign). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Netskope One Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netskope-one-private-access) Best for: Teams replacing a VPN with one client and one console It belongs here because it handles non-web traffic and unmanaged devices in the same product, so SSH, RDP and contractor access do not need a second path. Its size fit is mid-market and enterprise. Run App Segment Discovery before you write rules, because it shows the ports and hosts each app really needs. From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Netskope One Private Access | NoPorts | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Netskope | Atsign | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Netskope One Private Access | NoPorts | |---|---|---| | BYOD | Yes | – | | Hybrid Work | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | Yes | | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | Encryption | – | Yes | | SSH | – | Yes | | Authentication | – | Yes | | Private Networks | – | Yes | | Microsegmentation | – | Yes | | Infrastructure | – | Yes | | Network Protection | – | Yes | ### Core features **Netskope One Private Access** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **NoPorts** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Netskope One Private Access** 3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **NoPorts** No integrations listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Netskope One Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netskope-one-private-access) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. - [NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/tools/noports) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business. ## Netskope One Private Access vs NoPorts FAQ Common questions when comparing Netskope One Private Access vs NoPorts for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between Netskope One Private Access and NoPorts? **Netskope One Private Access**: Zero trust access to private apps that replaces the legacy VPN, built by Netskope. **NoPorts**: Zero-open-port remote access via cryptographic identity-first connectivity, built by Atsign. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Netskope One Private Access and NoPorts? **Netskope One Private Access** is made by Netskope. **NoPorts** is made by Atsign. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Netskope One Private Access a good alternative to NoPorts? Often, yes. Netskope One Private Access and NoPorts are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Netskope One Private Access vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netskope-one-private-access-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [Netskope One Private Access vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netskope-one-private-access-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) - [Netskope One Private Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netskope-one-private-access-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [NoPorts vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/noports-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [NoPorts vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/noports-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) - [NoPorts vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/noports-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Netskope One Private Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/netskope-one-private-access) - [See all NoPorts alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/noports) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/netskope-one-private-access-vs-noports For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/netskope-one-private-access.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Netskope One Private Access and NoPorts: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md