# Nanitor vs Qualys TotalAppSec: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Nanitor](https://cybersectools.com/tools/nanitor) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [Nanitor](https://cybersectools.com/companies/nanitor). [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Qualys](https://cybersectools.com/companies/qualys). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) Best for: Teams already running Qualys for vulnerability management It earns its place because it finds the web apps and APIs you may have lost track of before it tests them, which matters in large, spread-out estates. It fits best if you already run Qualys VMDR or CSAM, so web findings share one risk score with the rest. Because it can pull in results from other scanners, decide whether you want it as your single view of web app risk or as one source among several. From [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | Nanitor | Qualys TotalAppSec | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Vulnerability Assessment | Dynamic Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Nanitor | Qualys | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Nanitor | Qualys TotalAppSec | |---|---|---| | Vulnerability | Yes | – | | Vulnerability Prioritization | Yes | – | | Configuration Management | Yes | – | | Patch Management | Yes | – | | Security Hardening | Yes | – | | Security Reporting | Yes | – | | Inventory | Yes | – | | Security Audit | Yes | – | | DAST | – | Yes | | OWASP | – | Yes | | PII | – | Yes | | Web Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **Nanitor** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Qualys TotalAppSec** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Nanitor** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Qualys TotalAppSec** 20 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Nanitor](https://cybersectools.com/tools/nanitor) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. - [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) fits if you want a cloud product. ## Nanitor vs Qualys TotalAppSec FAQ Common questions when comparing Nanitor vs Qualys TotalAppSec for vulnerability assessment. ### What is the difference between Nanitor and Qualys TotalAppSec? **Nanitor**: CTEM platform for VM, security config, and patch intelligence across IT infra. Built by Nanitor. **Qualys TotalAppSec**: Cloud-based DAST solution for web app & API security with AI-powered scanning. Built by Qualys. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Nanitor and Qualys TotalAppSec? **Nanitor** is made by Nanitor. **Qualys TotalAppSec** is made by Qualys. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Nanitor a good alternative to Qualys TotalAppSec? In part. Nanitor and Qualys TotalAppSec are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Nanitor vs Deepwatch Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/deepwatch-vulnerability-management-vs-nanitor) - [Nanitor vs UVM: Unified Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/nanitor-vs-uvm-unified-vulnerability-management) - [Nanitor vs Spektion](https://cybersectools.com/compare/nanitor-vs-spektion) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Deepwatch Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/deepwatch-vulnerability-management-vs-qualys-totalappsec) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs UVM: Unified Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/qualys-totalappsec-vs-uvm-unified-vulnerability-management) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Spektion](https://cybersectools.com/compare/qualys-totalappsec-vs-spektion) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Nanitor alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/nanitor) - [See all Qualys TotalAppSec alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/qualys-totalappsec) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/nanitor-vs-qualys-totalappsec For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/nanitor.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Nanitor and Qualys TotalAppSec: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md