# Microsoft Entra Private Access vs VIPRE Encrypt.team: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). [VIPRE Encrypt.team](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vipre-encryptteam) is a commercial [VPN](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vpn) solution by [Vipre](https://cybersectools.com/companies/vipre). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) Best for: Companies that run identity on Microsoft Entra ID If identity already runs on Entra ID, this reuses your Conditional Access rules as access rules, so there is no second policy engine to run. The MFA for legacy protocols suits mid-market and enterprise estates with older Windows apps. Check licensing first, because users also need Entra ID P1 or P2. From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Microsoft Entra Private Access | VIPRE Encrypt.team | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | VPN | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Microsoft | Vipre | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Microsoft Entra Private Access | VIPRE Encrypt.team | |---|---|---| | BYOD | Yes | – | | Least Privilege | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | Yes | | SSO | Yes | – | | ZTNA | Yes | – | | Encryption | – | Yes | ### Core features **Microsoft Entra Private Access** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **VIPRE Encrypt.team** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Microsoft Entra Private Access** 9 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **VIPRE Encrypt.team** No integrations listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. - [VIPRE Encrypt.team](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vipre-encryptteam) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup or a small business. ## Microsoft Entra Private Access vs VIPRE Encrypt.team FAQ Common questions when comparing Microsoft Entra Private Access vs VIPRE Encrypt.team for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between Microsoft Entra Private Access and VIPRE Encrypt.team? **Microsoft Entra Private Access**: Identity-based zero trust access to private apps that replaces the legacy VPN. Built by Microsoft. **VIPRE Encrypt.team**: Cloud-based VPN for securing remote workforce connections and access. Built by Vipre. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Microsoft Entra Private Access and VIPRE Encrypt.team? **Microsoft Entra Private Access** is made by Microsoft. **VIPRE Encrypt.team** is made by Vipre. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Microsoft Entra Private Access a good alternative to VIPRE Encrypt.team? In part. Microsoft Entra Private Access and VIPRE Encrypt.team are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access) - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [VIPRE Encrypt.team vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-vipre-encryptteam) - [VIPRE Encrypt.team vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine-vs-vipre-encryptteam) - [VIPRE Encrypt.team vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-vipre-encryptteam) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Microsoft Entra Private Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra-private-access) - [See all VIPRE Encrypt.team alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/vipre-encryptteam) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-vipre-encryptteam For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Microsoft Entra Private Access and VIPRE Encrypt.team: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md