# Microsoft Entra Private Access vs SecureCo Stealth: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). [SecureCo Stealth](https://cybersectools.com/tools/secureco-stealth) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [SecureCo](https://cybersectools.com/companies/secureco). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access)

Best for: Companies that run identity on Microsoft Entra ID

If identity already runs on Entra ID, this reuses your Conditional Access rules as access rules, so there is no second policy engine to run. The MFA for legacy protocols suits mid-market and enterprise estates with older Windows apps. Check licensing first, because users also need Entra ID P1 or P2.

From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Microsoft Entra Private Access | SecureCo Stealth |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Microsoft | SecureCo |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Microsoft Entra Private Access | SecureCo Stealth |
|---|---|---|
| BYOD | Yes | – |
| Least Privilege | Yes | – |
| Remote Access | Yes | Yes |
| SSO | Yes | – |
| ZTNA | Yes | – |
| Obfuscation | – | Yes |
| Anonymity | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**SecureCo Stealth**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**

9 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**SecureCo Stealth**

No integrations listed.

## Microsoft Entra Private Access vs SecureCo Stealth FAQ

Common questions when comparing Microsoft Entra Private Access vs SecureCo Stealth for zero trust network access.

### What is the difference between Microsoft Entra Private Access and SecureCo Stealth?

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**: Identity-based zero trust access to private apps that replaces the legacy VPN. Built by Microsoft.

**SecureCo Stealth**: Network obfuscation platform that conceals endpoints and camouflages data. Built by SecureCo.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Microsoft Entra Private Access and SecureCo Stealth?

**Microsoft Entra Private Access** is made by Microsoft. **SecureCo Stealth** is made by SecureCo. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Microsoft Entra Private Access a good alternative to SecureCo Stealth?

Often, yes. Microsoft Entra Private Access and SecureCo Stealth are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [SecureCo Stealth vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-secureco-stealth)
- [SecureCo Stealth vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-secureco-stealth)
- [SecureCo Stealth vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-secureco-stealth)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Microsoft Entra Private Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [See all SecureCo Stealth alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/secureco-stealth)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-secureco-stealth

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Microsoft Entra Private Access and SecureCo Stealth: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md