# Mi-Token vs Progress ShareFile User Authentication: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Mi-Token](https://cybersectools.com/tools/mi-token) is a commercial [MFA & passwordless](https://cybersectools.com/categories/user-authentication) solution by [Mi-Token](https://cybersectools.com/companies/mi-token). [Progress ShareFile User Authentication](https://cybersectools.com/tools/progress-sharefile-user-authentication) is a commercial [MFA & passwordless](https://cybersectools.com/categories/user-authentication) solution by [ShareFile](https://cybersectools.com/companies/sharefile). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best MFA and Passwordless Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-mfa-passwordless-solutions) picks Okta Adaptive MFA, Cisco Duo Passwordless, Beyond Identity Phishing-Resistant MFA and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Mi-Token | Progress ShareFile User Authentication |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | MFA & Passwordless | MFA & Passwordless |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Mi-Token | ShareFile |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Mi-Token | Progress ShareFile User Authentication |
|---|---|---|
| MFA | Yes | – |
| SSO | Yes | – |
| Authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Active Directory | Yes | – |
| Single Sign On | Yes | – |
| Windows Security | Yes | – |
| Password Management | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Mi-Token**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Progress ShareFile User Authentication**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Mi-Token**

5 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Progress ShareFile User Authentication**

2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Mi-Token](https://cybersectools.com/tools/mi-token) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.
- [Progress ShareFile User Authentication](https://cybersectools.com/tools/progress-sharefile-user-authentication) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business.

## Mi-Token vs Progress ShareFile User Authentication FAQ

Common questions when comparing Mi-Token vs Progress ShareFile User Authentication for MFA & passwordless.

### What is the difference between Mi-Token and Progress ShareFile User Authentication?

**Mi-Token**: MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration, built by Mi-Token.

**Progress ShareFile User Authentication**: User authentication features for ShareFile file sharing platform, built by ShareFile.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Mi-Token and Progress ShareFile User Authentication?

**Mi-Token** is made by Mi-Token. **Progress ShareFile User Authentication** is made by ShareFile. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Mi-Token a good alternative to Progress ShareFile User Authentication?

Often, yes. Mi-Token and Progress ShareFile User Authentication are both MFA & Passwordless products, and both cover Authentication. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Mi-Token vs Protectimus On-Premise MFA Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mi-token-vs-protectimus-on-premise-mfa-platform)
- [Mi-Token vs digitronic SmartLogon™](https://cybersectools.com/compare/digitronic-smartlogontm-vs-mi-token)
- [Mi-Token vs miniOrange Hubspot 2FA](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mi-token-vs-miniorange-hubspot-2fa)
- [Progress ShareFile User Authentication vs Protectimus On-Premise MFA Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/progress-sharefile-user-authentication-vs-protectimus-on-premise-mfa-platform)
- [Progress ShareFile User Authentication vs digitronic SmartLogon™](https://cybersectools.com/compare/digitronic-smartlogontm-vs-progress-sharefile-user-authentication)
- [Progress ShareFile User Authentication vs miniOrange Hubspot 2FA](https://cybersectools.com/compare/miniorange-hubspot-2fa-vs-progress-sharefile-user-authentication)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Mi-Token alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/mi-token)
- [See all Progress ShareFile User Authentication alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/progress-sharefile-user-authentication)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/mi-token-vs-progress-sharefile-user-authentication

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/mi-token.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Mi-Token and Progress ShareFile User Authentication: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md