# Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Natoma MCP Gateway: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx) is a commercial [agentic AI security](https://cybersectools.com/categories/agentic-ai-security) solution by [Lunar.dev](https://cybersectools.com/companies/lunardev). [Natoma MCP Gateway](https://cybersectools.com/tools/natoma-mcp-gateway) is a commercial [agentic AI security](https://cybersectools.com/categories/agentic-ai-security) solution by [Natoma](https://cybersectools.com/companies/natoma). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Agentic AI Security Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-agentic-ai-security-solutions) picks CrowdStrike Falcon Guardian, Rubrik Agent Cloud, Silverfort AI Agent Security and 5 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) | Natoma MCP Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Agentic AI Security | Agentic AI Security |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Lunar.dev | Natoma |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) | Natoma MCP Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| MCP Security | Yes | Yes |
| Agentic AI Security | Yes | – |
| AI Gateway | Yes | – |
| AI Governance | Yes | – |
| RBAC | Yes | – |
| SSO | Yes | – |
| Gateway | Yes | Yes |
| Observability | Yes | – |
| LLM Security | Yes | – |
| AI Observability | Yes | – |
| Authentication | – | Yes |
| Least Privilege | – | Yes |
| Policy | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Natoma MCP Gateway**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)**

3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Natoma MCP Gateway**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx) fits if you are a small business.

## Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Natoma MCP Gateway FAQ

Common questions when comparing Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Natoma MCP Gateway for agentic AI security.

### What is the difference between Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) and Natoma MCP Gateway?

**Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)**: Gateway for securing, governing, and auditing AI agent access to MCP servers. Built by Lunar.dev.

**Natoma MCP Gateway**: Enterprise gateway for managing AI agent access to enterprise data via MCP. Built by Natoma.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) and Natoma MCP Gateway?

**Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX)** is made by Lunar.dev. **Natoma MCP Gateway** is made by Natoma. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) a good alternative to Natoma MCP Gateway?

Often, yes. Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) and Natoma MCP Gateway are both Agentic AI Security products, and both cover Gateway, MCP Security. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Primary Agentic Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/compare/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx-vs-primary-agentic-control-plane)
- [Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs Agen Shield](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agen-shield-vs-lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx)
- [Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) vs JetStream Security-First AI Governance Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/jetstream-saig-platform-vs-lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx)
- [Natoma MCP Gateway vs Primary Agentic Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/compare/natoma-mcp-gateway-vs-primary-agentic-control-plane)
- [Natoma MCP Gateway vs Agen Shield](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agen-shield-vs-natoma-mcp-gateway)
- [Natoma MCP Gateway vs JetStream Security-First AI Governance Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/jetstream-saig-platform-vs-natoma-mcp-gateway)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx)
- [See all Natoma MCP Gateway alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/natoma-mcp-gateway)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx-vs-natoma-mcp-gateway

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/lunardev-mcp-gateway-mcpx.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Lunar.dev MCP Gateway (MCPX) and Natoma MCP Gateway: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md