# LFI-files vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing: side-by-side comparison (2026) [LFI-files](https://cybersectools.com/tools/lfi-files) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Mgm Security Partners](https://cybersectools.com/companies/mgm-security-partners). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | LFI-files | Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Free | Commercial | | Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | On-Premises | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | GitHub stars | 125 | – | | Last commit | Oct 2019 | – | | Company | – | Mgm Security Partners | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | LFI-files | Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing | |---|---|---| | Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – | | LFI | Yes | – | | Brute Force | Yes | Yes | | Penetration Testing Framework | – | Yes | | Active Directory | – | Yes | | Privilege Escalation | – | Yes | | Lateral Movement | – | Yes | | Password Cracking | – | Yes | | VAPT | – | Yes | | Network Scanning | – | Yes | | Kubernetes Security | – | Yes | | Remote Access | – | Yes | ### Core features **LFI-files** No features listed. **Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [LFI-files](https://cybersectools.com/tools/lfi-files) fits if you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product. ## LFI-files vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing FAQ Common questions when comparing LFI-files vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing for penetration testing. ### What is the difference between LFI-files and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing? **LFI-files**: A wordlist to bruteforce for Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerabilities. **Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing**: Infrastructure penetration testing service covering external, internal, identity. Built by Mgm Security Partners. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes LFI-files and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing? **LFI-files** is open-source with 125 GitHub stars. **Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing** is made by Mgm Security Partners. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is LFI-files a good alternative to Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing? Often, yes. LFI-files and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Brute Force. Key differences: LFI-files is Free while Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing is Commercial, LFI-files is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [LFI-files vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/lfi-files-vs-offsec-penetration-testing-services) - [LFI-files vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/lfi-files-vs-pt-dephaze) - [LFI-files vs Webray RayBox](https://cybersectools.com/compare/lfi-files-vs-webray-raybox) - [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-offsec-penetration-testing-services) - [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-pt-dephaze) - [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs Webray RayBox](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-webray-raybox) ## Alternatives to each - [See all LFI-files alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/lfi-files) - [See all Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/lfi-files-vs-mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/lfi-files.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on LFI-files and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md