# hoop.dev vs BeyondTrust Modern PAM: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[hoop.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hoopdev) is a commercial [privileged access management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pam) solution by [Hoop.dev](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hoopdev). [BeyondTrust Modern PAM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/privileged-access-management-pam) is a commercial [privileged access management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pam) solution by [BeyondTrust](https://cybersectools.com/companies/beyondtrust). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [BeyondTrust Modern PAM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/privileged-access-management-pam)

Best for: Hybrid estates moving to zero standing privileges

It leads this list because it is built around removing standing privilege, which is where the operating model in this category is heading, and it shows the Paths to Privilege an attacker could take. It fits a mid-size or large hybrid estate with outside vendors who need access. If you still run many shared admin accounts, plan how you will move off them before you lean on just-in-time access.

From [Best PAM Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-pam-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best PAM Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-pam-solutions) picks BeyondTrust Modern PAM, Palo Alto Networks Idira, Delinea Secret Server and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | hoop.dev | BeyondTrust Modern PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Privileged Access Management | Privileged Access Management |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Hoop.dev | BeyondTrust |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | hoop.dev | BeyondTrust Modern PAM |
|---|---|---|
| PAM | Yes | – |
| AI Data Gateway | Yes | – |
| Database Security | Yes | – |
| Agentic AI Security | Yes | – |
| PII | Yes | – |
| Least Privilege | Yes | Yes |
| Kubernetes | Yes | – |
| GDPR | Yes | – |
| PCI DSS | Yes | – |
| Sensitive Data | Yes | – |

### Core features

**hoop.dev**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**BeyondTrust Modern PAM**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**hoop.dev**

3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**BeyondTrust Modern PAM**

28 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [hoop.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hoopdev) fits if you need to run it on your own servers and you are a small business.
- [BeyondTrust Modern PAM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/privileged-access-management-pam) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## hoop.dev vs BeyondTrust Modern PAM FAQ

Common questions when comparing hoop.dev vs BeyondTrust Modern PAM for privileged access management.

### What is the difference between hoop.dev and BeyondTrust Modern PAM?

**hoop.dev**: Gateway governing engineer & AI agent access to production infra, built by Hoop.dev.

**BeyondTrust Modern PAM**: BeyondTrust PAM combining identity risk insights, JIT access, and secure remote access, built by BeyondTrust.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes hoop.dev and BeyondTrust Modern PAM?

**hoop.dev** is made by Hoop.dev. **BeyondTrust Modern PAM** is made by BeyondTrust. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is hoop.dev a good alternative to BeyondTrust Modern PAM?

Often, yes. hoop.dev and BeyondTrust Modern PAM are both Privileged Access Management products, and both cover Least Privilege. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [hoop.dev vs Venice PAM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hoopdev-vs-venice-pam)
- [hoop.dev vs Rubycat PROVE IT](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hoopdev-vs-rubycat-prove-it)
- [hoop.dev vs QueryPie ACP](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hoopdev-vs-querypie-acp)
- [BeyondTrust Modern PAM vs Venice PAM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/privileged-access-management-pam-vs-venice-pam)
- [BeyondTrust Modern PAM vs Rubycat PROVE IT](https://cybersectools.com/compare/privileged-access-management-pam-vs-rubycat-prove-it)
- [BeyondTrust Modern PAM vs QueryPie ACP](https://cybersectools.com/compare/privileged-access-management-pam-vs-querypie-acp)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all hoop.dev alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hoopdev)
- [See all BeyondTrust Modern PAM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/privileged-access-management-pam)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hoopdev-vs-privileged-access-management-pam

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hoopdev.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on hoop.dev and BeyondTrust Modern PAM: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md