# Agentic Development Security vs OpenText Fortify SAST: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Agentic Development Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation) is a commercial [application security posture management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/aspm) solution by [Heeler](https://cybersectools.com/companies/heeler). [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [OpenText Cybersecurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/opentext-cybersecurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) Best for: Large companies wanting cloud or on-premises scans with compliance reports It earns a place because it runs as SaaS, private hosted or fully on premises, and its policies report against OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which suits regulated teams that cannot send code to a shared cloud. Decide who owns the scan policies, since blocking builds only works when someone sets what counts as a blocker. From [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | Agentic Development Security | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Application Security Posture Management | Static Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Heeler | OpenText Cybersecurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Agentic Development Security | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | DevSecOps | Yes | Yes | | SAST | Yes | Yes | | Software Supply Chain | Yes | – | | Software Security | Yes | – | | Secret Detection | Yes | – | | App Security | Yes | – | | Dependency Scanning | Yes | – | | CI/CD | – | Yes | | IDE | – | Yes | | Source Code Analysis | – | Yes | ### Core features **Agentic Development Security** 9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Agentic Development Security** 18 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Agentic Development Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business. - [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. ## Agentic Development Security vs OpenText Fortify SAST FAQ Common questions when comparing Agentic Development Security vs OpenText Fortify SAST for application security posture management. ### What is the difference between Agentic Development Security and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Agentic Development Security**: Finds and fixes security risks in the AI software development lifecycle (SDLC). Built by Heeler. **OpenText Fortify SAST**: Static code analysis that finds security flaws in source code early. Built by OpenText Cybersecurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Agentic Development Security and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Agentic Development Security** is made by Heeler. **OpenText Fortify SAST** is made by OpenText Cybersecurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Agentic Development Security a good alternative to OpenText Fortify SAST? In part. Agentic Development Security and OpenText Fortify SAST are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover DevSecOps, SAST. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Agentic Development Security vs Legit VibeGuard](https://cybersectools.com/compare/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation-vs-legit-vibeguard) - [Agentic Development Security vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-heeler-application-security-auto-remediation) - [Agentic Development Security vs depthfirst Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/depthfirst-vs-heeler-application-security-auto-remediation) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Legit VibeGuard](https://cybersectools.com/compare/legit-vibeguard-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs depthfirst Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/depthfirst-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Agentic Development Security alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation) - [See all OpenText Fortify SAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/opentext-fortify-sast) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation-vs-opentext-fortify-sast For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/heeler-application-security-auto-remediation.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Agentic Development Security and OpenText Fortify SAST: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md