# HeaderHawk vs Qualys TotalAppSec: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[HeaderHawk](https://cybersectools.com/tools/headerhawk) is a commercial [web skimming & client-side protection](https://cybersectools.com/categories/web-skimming-protection) solution by [HeaderHawk](https://cybersectools.com/companies/headerhawk). [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Qualys](https://cybersectools.com/companies/qualys). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec)

Best for: Teams already running Qualys for vulnerability management

It earns its place because it finds the web apps and APIs you may have lost track of before it tests them, which matters in large, spread-out estates. It fits best if you already run Qualys VMDR or CSAM, so web findings share one risk score with the rest. Because it can pull in results from other scanners, decide whether you want it as your single view of web app risk or as one source among several.

From [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

## Side-by-side comparison

| | HeaderHawk | Qualys TotalAppSec |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Web Skimming & Client-Side Protection | Dynamic Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | HeaderHawk | Qualys |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | HeaderHawk | Qualys TotalAppSec |
|---|---|---|
| Content Security Policy | Yes | – |
| Browser Security | Yes | – |
| PCI DSS | Yes | – |
| Web Security | Yes | Yes |
| Alerting | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Scanning | Yes | – |
| Security Compliance Training | Yes | – |
| Security Policy | Yes | – |
| DAST | – | Yes |
| OWASP | – | Yes |
| PII | – | Yes |

### Core features

**HeaderHawk**

9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Qualys TotalAppSec**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**HeaderHawk**

3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Qualys TotalAppSec**

20 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [HeaderHawk](https://cybersectools.com/tools/headerhawk) fits if you are a startup.

## HeaderHawk vs Qualys TotalAppSec FAQ

Common questions when comparing HeaderHawk vs Qualys TotalAppSec for web skimming & client-side protection.

### What is the difference between HeaderHawk and Qualys TotalAppSec?

**HeaderHawk**: Client-side CSP/browser report monitoring and PCI DSS 4.0 payment-page script tracking. Built by HeaderHawk.

**Qualys TotalAppSec**: Cloud-based DAST solution for web app & API security with AI-powered scanning. Built by Qualys.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes HeaderHawk and Qualys TotalAppSec?

**HeaderHawk** is made by HeaderHawk. **Qualys TotalAppSec** is made by Qualys. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is HeaderHawk a good alternative to Qualys TotalAppSec?

In part. HeaderHawk and Qualys TotalAppSec are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Web Security. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [HeaderHawk vs Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance](https://cybersectools.com/compare/akamai-client-side-protection-and-compliance-vs-headerhawk)
- [HeaderHawk vs HUMAN Malvertising](https://cybersectools.com/compare/headerhawk-vs-human-malvertising)
- [HeaderHawk vs Feroot GLBA Compliance Monitoring](https://cybersectools.com/compare/feroot-glba-compliance-monitoring-vs-headerhawk)
- [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance](https://cybersectools.com/compare/akamai-client-side-protection-and-compliance-vs-qualys-totalappsec)
- [Qualys TotalAppSec vs HUMAN Malvertising](https://cybersectools.com/compare/human-malvertising-vs-qualys-totalappsec)
- [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Feroot GLBA Compliance Monitoring](https://cybersectools.com/compare/feroot-glba-compliance-monitoring-vs-qualys-totalappsec)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all HeaderHawk alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/headerhawk)
- [See all Qualys TotalAppSec alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/qualys-totalappsec)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/headerhawk-vs-qualys-totalappsec

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/headerhawk.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on HeaderHawk and Qualys TotalAppSec: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md