# HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs Vade for M365: side-by-side comparison (2026) [HAProxy Fusion Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/tools/haproxy-fusion-control-plane) is a commercial [next-gen firewalls](https://cybersectools.com/categories/next-generation-firewalls) solution by [HAProxy Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/haproxy-technologies). [Vade for M365](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vade-for-m365) is a commercial [anti-phishing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/anti-phishing) solution by [Vade](https://cybersectools.com/companies/vade). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best Next-Generation Firewall Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-next-generation-firewalls) picks Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls, Fortinet FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall, Cisco Secure Firewall and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | HAProxy Fusion Control Plane | Vade for M365 | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Next-Gen Firewalls | Anti-Phishing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market | | Company | HAProxy Technologies | Vade | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | HAProxy Fusion Control Plane | Vade for M365 | |---|---|---| | WAF | Yes | – | | RBAC | Yes | – | | Observability | Yes | – | | Bot Protection | Yes | – | | DDoS | Yes | – | | Traffic Filtering | Yes | – | | Multi Tenancy | Yes | Yes | | Configuration Management | Yes | – | | REST API | Yes | – | | Network Monitoring | Yes | – | | Microsoft 365 | – | Yes | | Outlook | – | Yes | | DMARC | – | Yes | | Fraud Detection | – | Yes | | Spam Prevention | – | Yes | | Office 365 | – | Yes | ### Core features **HAProxy Fusion Control Plane** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Vade for M365** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **HAProxy Fusion Control Plane** 3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Vade for M365** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [HAProxy Fusion Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/tools/haproxy-fusion-control-plane) fits if you need to run it on your own servers and you are an enterprise. - [Vade for M365](https://cybersectools.com/tools/vade-for-m365) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup or a small business. ## HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs Vade for M365 FAQ Common questions when comparing HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs Vade for M365 for next-gen firewalls. ### What is the difference between HAProxy Fusion Control Plane and Vade for M365? **HAProxy Fusion Control Plane**: Self-hosted control plane for managing multi-cluster HAProxy Enterprise deployments. Built by HAProxy Technologies. **Vade for M365**: AI-based email security for Microsoft 365, built for MSPs to protect client mailboxes. Built by Vade. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes HAProxy Fusion Control Plane and Vade for M365? **HAProxy Fusion Control Plane** is made by HAProxy Technologies. **Vade for M365** is made by Vade. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is HAProxy Fusion Control Plane a good alternative to Vade for M365? In part. HAProxy Fusion Control Plane and Vade for M365 are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Multi Tenancy. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs WiJungle Unified Cyber Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/haproxy-fusion-control-plane-vs-wijungle-unified-cyber-security-platform) - [HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs Clavister NetWall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/clavister-netwall-vs-haproxy-fusion-control-plane) - [HAProxy Fusion Control Plane vs genugate High Resistance Firewall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/genugate-high-resistance-firewall-vs-haproxy-fusion-control-plane) - [Vade for M365 vs WiJungle Unified Cyber Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/vade-for-m365-vs-wijungle-unified-cyber-security-platform) - [Vade for M365 vs Clavister NetWall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/clavister-netwall-vs-vade-for-m365) - [Vade for M365 vs genugate High Resistance Firewall](https://cybersectools.com/compare/genugate-high-resistance-firewall-vs-vade-for-m365) ## Alternatives to each - [See all HAProxy Fusion Control Plane alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/haproxy-fusion-control-plane) - [See all Vade for M365 alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/vade-for-m365) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/haproxy-fusion-control-plane-vs-vade-for-m365 For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/haproxy-fusion-control-plane.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on HAProxy Fusion Control Plane and Vade for M365: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md