# @hapi/bourne vs OpenText Fortify SAST: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[@hapi/bourne](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hapibourne) is a free [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution. [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [OpenText Cybersecurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/opentext-cybersecurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast)

Best for: Large companies wanting cloud or on-premises scans with compliance reports

It earns a place because it runs as SaaS, private hosted or fully on premises, and its policies report against OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which suits regulated teams that cannot send code to a shared cloud. Decide who owns the scan policies, since blocking builds only works when someone sets what counts as a blocker.

From [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions) picks Checkmarx One Application Security Platform, Veracode Application Risk Management Platform, OpenText Fortify SAST and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | @hapi/bourne | OpenText Fortify SAST |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Static Application Security Testing | Static Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 179 | – |
| Last commit | Oct 2024 | – |
| Company | – | OpenText Cybersecurity |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | @hapi/bourne | OpenText Fortify SAST |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | – | Yes |
| DevSecOps | – | Yes |
| IDE | – | Yes |
| SAST | – | Yes |
| Source Code Analysis | – | Yes |

### Core features

**@hapi/bourne**

No features listed.

**OpenText Fortify SAST**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**@hapi/bourne**

No integrations listed.

**OpenText Fortify SAST**

12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [@hapi/bourne](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hapibourne) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup or a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## @hapi/bourne vs OpenText Fortify SAST FAQ

Common questions when comparing @hapi/bourne vs OpenText Fortify SAST for static application security testing.

### What is the difference between @hapi/bourne and OpenText Fortify SAST?

**@hapi/bourne**: JSON.parse() drop-in replacement with prototype poisoning protection.

**OpenText Fortify SAST**: Static code analysis that finds security flaws in source code early. Built by OpenText Cybersecurity.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes @hapi/bourne and OpenText Fortify SAST?

**@hapi/bourne** is open-source with 179 GitHub stars. **OpenText Fortify SAST** is made by OpenText Cybersecurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is @hapi/bourne a good alternative to OpenText Fortify SAST?

Often, yes. @hapi/bourne and OpenText Fortify SAST are both Static Application Security Testing products. Key differences: @hapi/bourne is Free while OpenText Fortify SAST is Commercial, @hapi/bourne is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [@hapi/bourne vs Qodo AI Code Review Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hapibourne-vs-qodo-for-pycharm)
- [@hapi/bourne vs Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aikido-static-application-security-testing-sast-vs-hapibourne)
- [@hapi/bourne vs Gecko Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/gecko-security-vs-hapibourne)
- [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Qodo AI Code Review Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/opentext-fortify-sast-vs-qodo-for-pycharm)
- [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aikido-static-application-security-testing-sast-vs-opentext-fortify-sast)
- [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Gecko Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/gecko-security-vs-opentext-fortify-sast)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all @hapi/bourne alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hapibourne)
- [See all OpenText Fortify SAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/opentext-fortify-sast)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hapibourne-vs-opentext-fortify-sast

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hapibourne.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on @hapi/bourne and OpenText Fortify SAST: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md