# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/tools/runsybil) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/companies/runsybil). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Hackurity | RunSybil |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | Yes |
| Attack Paths | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | – |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Outsourced Security | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability Prioritization | – | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | – | Yes |
| DAST | – | Yes |
| Red Team | – | Yes |
| Security Scanning | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Cloud Native | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**RunSybil**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/tools/runsybil) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business.

## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil FAQ

Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and RunSybil?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity.

**RunSybil**: AI-driven continuous attack surface assessment and validation platform, built by RunSybil.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and RunSybil?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **RunSybil** is made by RunSybil. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to RunSybil?

Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and RunSybil are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover AI Pentesting, Attack Paths, Continuous Testing. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Strike PTaaS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-strike-ptaas)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs AI Pentest Copilot](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ai-pentest-copilot-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-netspi-platform)
- [RunSybil vs Strike PTaaS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/runsybil-vs-strike-ptaas)
- [RunSybil vs AI Pentest Copilot](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ai-pentest-copilot-vs-runsybil)
- [RunSybil vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-platform-vs-runsybil)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)
- [See all RunSybil alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/runsybil)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-runsybil

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and RunSybil: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md