# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PT Dephaze: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/tools/pt-dephaze) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Positive Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/positive-technologies). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | PT Dephaze |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Hackurity | Positive Technologies |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | PT Dephaze |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | Yes |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Outsourced Security | Yes | – |
| MITRE ATT&CK | – | Yes |
| Lateral Movement | – | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | – | Yes |
| Network Scanning | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Red Team | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**PT Dephaze**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/tools/pt-dephaze) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.

## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PT Dephaze FAQ

Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PT Dephaze for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PT Dephaze?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity.

**PT Dephaze**: Agentless automated pentest platform for continuous infrastructure security testing, built by Positive Technologies.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PT Dephaze?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **PT Dephaze** is made by Positive Technologies. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to PT Dephaze?

Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PT Dephaze are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Continuous Testing, Privilege Escalation, Security Validation. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-runsybil)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-netspi-platform)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [PT Dephaze vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/pt-dephaze-vs-runsybil)
- [PT Dephaze vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-platform-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [PT Dephaze vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-pt-dephaze)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)
- [See all PT Dephaze alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/pt-dephaze)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-pt-dephaze

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PT Dephaze: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md