# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): side-by-side comparison (2026) [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/petep-penetration-testing-proxy) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Free | | Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market | | GitHub stars | – | 225 | | Last commit | – | Dec 2023 | | Company | Hackurity | – | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) | |---|---|---| | AI Pentesting | Yes | – | | Attack Paths | Yes | – | | Continuous Testing | Yes | – | | Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – | | Privilege Escalation | Yes | – | | Post Exploitation | Yes | – | | Supply Chain Security | Yes | – | | Security Validation | Yes | – | | Security Reporting | Yes | – | | Outsourced Security | Yes | – | | Proxy | – | Yes | ### Core features **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)** No features listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are an enterprise. - [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/petep-penetration-testing-proxy) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup or a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product. ## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) FAQ Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) for penetration testing. ### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)? **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity. **PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)**: Open-source Java application for creating proxies for traffic analysis & modification. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)? **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)** is open-source with 225 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)? Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) are both Penetration Testing products. Key differences: Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is Commercial while PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is Free, PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine) - [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy) - [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/kinosec-zeus-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy) - [PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs ORDAL Continuous Pentesting Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ordal-continuous-pentesting-engine-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack) - [See all PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/petep-penetration-testing-proxy) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-petep-penetration-testing-proxy For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md