# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs o365-attack-toolkit: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [o365-attack-toolkit](https://cybersectools.com/tools/o365-attack-toolkit) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | o365-attack-toolkit |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | – | 1,116 |
| Last commit | – | Nov 2020 |
| Company | Hackurity | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | o365-attack-toolkit |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | – |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Outsourced Security | Yes | – |
| Password Spraying | – | Yes |
| Enumeration | – | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | – | Yes |
| Password Cracking | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**o365-attack-toolkit**

No features listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [o365-attack-toolkit](https://cybersectools.com/tools/o365-attack-toolkit) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs o365-attack-toolkit FAQ

Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs o365-attack-toolkit for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and o365-attack-toolkit?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.

**o365-attack-toolkit**: A toolkit to attack Office365, including tools for password spraying, password cracking, token manipulation, and exploiting vulnerabilities in Office365 APIs and services.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and o365-attack-toolkit?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **o365-attack-toolkit** is open-source with 1,116 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to o365-attack-toolkit?

Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and o365-attack-toolkit are both Penetration Testing products. Key differences: Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is Commercial while o365-attack-toolkit is Free, o365-attack-toolkit is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-runsybil)
- [o365-attack-toolkit vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-o365-attack-toolkit)
- [o365-attack-toolkit vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/kinosec-zeus-vs-o365-attack-toolkit)
- [o365-attack-toolkit vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/o365-attack-toolkit-vs-runsybil)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)
- [See all o365-attack-toolkit alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/o365-attack-toolkit)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-o365-attack-toolkit

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and o365-attack-toolkit: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md