# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs NetSPI Platform: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netspi-platform) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [NetSPI](https://cybersectools.com/companies/netspi). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | NetSPI Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Hackurity | NetSPI |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | NetSPI Platform |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | Yes |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | – |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Outsourced Security | Yes | – |
| Dark Web Monitoring | – | Yes |
| MITRE ATT&CK | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Red Team | – | Yes |
| Cloud Native | – | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**NetSPI Platform**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

No integrations listed.

**NetSPI Platform**

10 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netspi-platform) fits if you want a cloud product.

## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs NetSPI Platform FAQ

Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs NetSPI Platform for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and NetSPI Platform?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity.

**NetSPI Platform**: PTaaS platform combining human pentesters with AI for continuous security testing, built by NetSPI.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and NetSPI Platform?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **NetSPI Platform** is made by NetSPI. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to NetSPI Platform?

Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and NetSPI Platform are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Continuous Testing, AI Pentesting. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-runsybil)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [NetSPI Platform vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-platform-vs-runsybil)
- [NetSPI Platform vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-platform-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [NetSPI Platform vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-netspi-platform)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)
- [See all NetSPI Platform alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/netspi-platform)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-netspi-platform

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and NetSPI Platform: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md