# Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Industrial Security Exploitation Framework: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). [Industrial Security Exploitation Framework](https://cybersectools.com/tools/industrial-security-exploitation-framework) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | Industrial Security Exploitation Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | – | 252 |
| Last commit | – | Oct 2020 |
| Company | Hackurity | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | Industrial Security Exploitation Framework |
|---|---|---|
| AI Pentesting | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| Supply Chain Security | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | – |
| Security Reporting | Yes | – |
| Outsourced Security | Yes | – |
| Exploitation Framework | – | Yes |
| PLC | – | Yes |
| Scanner | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Industrial Security Exploitation Framework**

No features listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [Industrial Security Exploitation Framework](https://cybersectools.com/tools/industrial-security-exploitation-framework) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Industrial Security Exploitation Framework FAQ

Common questions when comparing Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Industrial Security Exploitation Framework for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and Industrial Security Exploitation Framework?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.

**Industrial Security Exploitation Framework**: An exploitation framework for industrial security with modules for controlling PLCs and scanning devices.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and Industrial Security Exploitation Framework?

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. **Industrial Security Exploitation Framework** is open-source with 252 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) a good alternative to Industrial Security Exploitation Framework?

Often, yes. Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and Industrial Security Exploitation Framework are both Penetration Testing products. Key differences: Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is Commercial while Industrial Security Exploitation Framework is Free, Industrial Security Exploitation Framework is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs CodeWall AI-Powered Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/codewall-ai-powered-pentesting-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Industrial Security Exploitation Framework vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-industrial-security-exploitation-framework)
- [Industrial Security Exploitation Framework vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/industrial-security-exploitation-framework-vs-kinosec-zeus)
- [Industrial Security Exploitation Framework vs CodeWall AI-Powered Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/codewall-ai-powered-pentesting-vs-industrial-security-exploitation-framework)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)
- [See all Industrial Security Exploitation Framework alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/industrial-security-exploitation-framework)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-industrial-security-exploitation-framework

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) and Industrial Security Exploitation Framework: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md