# Guardz External Footprint vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Guardz External Footprint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/guardz-external-footprint) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Guardz](https://cybersectools.com/companies/guardz). [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatdefence-integrated-asm) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [ThreatDefence](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatdefence). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Google Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Guardz External Footprint | ThreatDefence Integrated ASM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | External Attack Surface Management | External Attack Surface Management |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Guardz | ThreatDefence |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Guardz External Footprint | ThreatDefence Integrated ASM |
|---|---|---|
| Dark Web Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| DNS Security | Yes | Yes |
| SSL | Yes | Yes |
| TLS | Yes | – |
| Multi Tenancy | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Digital Risk Protection | – | Yes |
| Third Party Security | – | Yes |
| IoT Security | – | Yes |
| Subdomain Enumeration | – | Yes |
| Misconfiguration | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Guardz External Footprint**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**ThreatDefence Integrated ASM**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Guardz External Footprint**

2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**ThreatDefence Integrated ASM**

1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Guardz External Footprint vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM FAQ

Common questions when comparing Guardz External Footprint vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM for external attack surface management.

### What is the difference between Guardz External Footprint and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM?

**Guardz External Footprint**: External attack surface monitoring with dark web intelligence and scanning, built by Guardz.

**ThreatDefence Integrated ASM**: ASM platform monitoring external attack surface, dark web leaks & 3rd-party risks, built by ThreatDefence.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Guardz External Footprint and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM?

**Guardz External Footprint** is made by Guardz. **ThreatDefence Integrated ASM** is made by ThreatDefence. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Guardz External Footprint a good alternative to ThreatDefence Integrated ASM?

Often, yes. Guardz External Footprint and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM are both External Attack Surface Management products, and both cover Dark Web Monitoring, DNS Security, SSL. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Guardz External Footprint vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-threat-hunter-vs-guardz-external-footprint)
- [Guardz External Footprint vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ddactic-attack-surface-discovery-vs-guardz-external-footprint)
- [Guardz External Footprint vs Attack Surface Scan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/attack-surface-scan-vs-guardz-external-footprint)
- [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-threat-hunter-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ddactic-attack-surface-discovery-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs Attack Surface Scan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/attack-surface-scan-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Guardz External Footprint alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/guardz-external-footprint)
- [See all ThreatDefence Integrated ASM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatdefence-integrated-asm)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/guardz-external-footprint-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/guardz-external-footprint.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Guardz External Footprint and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md