# Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Group-IB Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/group-ib-attack-surface-management) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Group IB](https://cybersectools.com/companies/group-ib). [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatdefence-integrated-asm) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [ThreatDefence](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatdefence). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Group-IB Attack Surface Management | ThreatDefence Integrated ASM | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | External Attack Surface Management | External Attack Surface Management | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Group IB | ThreatDefence | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Group-IB Attack Surface Management | ThreatDefence Integrated ASM | |---|---|---| | Visualization | Yes | – | | Dark Web Monitoring | – | Yes | | Vulnerability | – | Yes | | DNS Security | – | Yes | | SSL | – | Yes | | Digital Risk Protection | – | Yes | | Third Party Security | – | Yes | | IoT Security | – | Yes | | Subdomain Enumeration | – | Yes | | Misconfiguration | – | Yes | ### Core features **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **ThreatDefence Integrated ASM** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** No integrations listed. **ThreatDefence Integrated ASM** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM FAQ Common questions when comparing Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM for external attack surface management. ### What is the difference between Group-IB Attack Surface Management and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM? **Group-IB Attack Surface Management**: External attack surface management platform with threat intelligence, built by Group IB. **ThreatDefence Integrated ASM**: ASM platform monitoring external attack surface, dark web leaks & 3rd-party risks, built by ThreatDefence. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Group-IB Attack Surface Management and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM? **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** is made by Group IB. **ThreatDefence Integrated ASM** is made by ThreatDefence. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Group-IB Attack Surface Management a good alternative to ThreatDefence Integrated ASM? Often, yes. Group-IB Attack Surface Management and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM are both External Attack Surface Management products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-threat-hunter-vs-group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ddactic-attack-surface-discovery-vs-group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Aleph Search](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aleph-search-clear-vs-group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-threat-hunter-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm) - [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ddactic-attack-surface-discovery-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm) - [ThreatDefence Integrated ASM vs Aleph Search](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aleph-search-clear-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Group-IB Attack Surface Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [See all ThreatDefence Integrated ASM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatdefence-integrated-asm) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/group-ib-attack-surface-management-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/group-ib-attack-surface-management.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Group-IB Attack Surface Management and ThreatDefence Integrated ASM: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md